/ Assisted Living
Long Term Care
/ Financial Abuse
|Find an Elder Law Attorney|
Spousal Impoverishment Now Available to Same Sex Spouses & RDPs
The Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) recently released ACWDL 12-36, which instructs counties to retroactively implement AB 641 (Feuer) effective January 1, 2012. AB 641, which added Welfare & Institutions Code §14015.12, extends spousal impoverishment protections now available to married, opposite-sex couples, to same-sex spouses and registered domestic partners through the transfer of property undue hardship provisions.
This change permits same-sex spouses and registered domestic partners to retain largely the same amount of income and property that opposite-sex spouses are permitted to retain when one of the spouses is an institutionalized spouse and the other spouse is a community spouse pursuant to All County Welfare Directors Letters (ACWDLs) 90-01 and 90-03.
The ACWDL instructs counties that, when transfers of property between same sex spouses or registered domestic partners are considered, a finding of undue hardship shall be found to exist if the institutionalized applicant/beneficiary 1) verifies or attests that he/she has a same sex spouse or RDP via the statement of facts, a signed statement by the applicant, or – at the option of either spouse – a copy of the marriage license or RDP certificate. The applicant/beneficiary must also provide verification of the net market value of all non-exempt property transferred to the same sex community spouse, other than the principal residence. To the extent that the net market value of that property does not exceed the CSRA that would be available to that person if he/she were an opposite-sex spouse, the same sex spouse or RDP would be able to retain that amount – $115,920 for 2013.
When proof of a same sex spouse or RDP is satisfied, the county shall reduce the share of cost as necessary to allow for the transfer of the spousal income allowance, if the amount of the transferred income does not cause the income of the same-sex spouse or registered domestic partner’s income to exceed the MMMNA - $2,898 in 2013.
The Medi-Cal eligibility determination rules contained in ACWDLs 90-01 and 90-03, applicable to opposite-sex spouses’ income and property evaluations, will be used to determine the nonexempt income and property available to the institutionalized applicant/beneficiary and his/her same-sex spouse or registered domestic partner. Additionally, the CSRA and the Spousal Income Allocation amounts may be increased using the same procedures as provided for opposite-sex spouses via fair hearing or court order.
This is a long time coming, and we extend our gratitude to Assembly member Feuer and the folks at the Medi-Cal Eligibility Division for helping to extend fairness and equity to same sex spouses and registered domestic partners. Now let’s hope the Supremes will suit. (Click the link for a copy of ACWDL 12-36, PDF)